21. Ott MA et al., The trade-off between hormones contraceptives and you can condoms certainly teenagers, Point of views on Sexual and you will Reproductive Fitness, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.
twenty two. Wilson EK and Koo Horsepower, Connections between lowest-income ladies relationship characteristics as well as their birth-control fool around with, Views to your Sexual and you may Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC ainsi que al., Relatives and you can buddy intimacy so you can teenage sexual partners for the link to condom have fun with, Log of Teenage Fitness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA mais aussi al., Brand new developmental association out-of matchmaking top quality, hormones birth control solutions and you may condom non-use certainly adolescent female, Log off Teenage Health, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty-five. Umphrey L and you can Sherblom J, Relational union and you will dangers in order to dating restoration needs: has an effect on towards the condom use, Record out-of Western College or university Wellness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
27. Manning WD mais aussi al., More youthful adult dating relationship and handling of sexual exposure, Population Browse and Plan Remark, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
28. Manlove J ainsi que al., Teen mothers from inside the promote proper care: chance items and you may results for childhood in addition to their children, Research Temporary, Washington, DC: Child Fashion, 2011.
29. DiClemente RJ et al., Sexual risk habits associated with the with more mature sex partners: a study of black colored teenage ladies, Sexually Carried Problems 2002, 29(1):20–24.
thirty two. Fortenberry JD et al., Condom play with as a function of time in the latest and you can based adolescent sexual dating, American Diary off Public Health, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you may Franzetta K, Risk and you can protective products of change so you’re able to a primary sexual relationship with an older companion, Journal regarding Teenage Wellness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Contraceptive fool around with models round the teens’ sexual relationships, papers demonstrated at yearly fulfilling of your Society Connection from The usa, Philadelphia, .
35. Manning WD, Giordano Desktop computer and you can Longmore MA, Hooking up: the relationship contexts out of “nonrelationship” sex, Diary regarding Teenage Lookup, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
36. Carlson MJ and you can Furstenberg FF, Jr, The effects out of multiple-married virility to own parental tips and you can dating, report showed in the yearly meeting of your Organization for Personal Plan Studies and Government, Arizona, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and you may Graefe DR, Searching for a friend? The fresh relationship and you may cohabitation records away from unwed mothers, in: Wu LL and you may Wolfe B, eds., Of Wedlock: Causes and you may Outcomes of Nonmarital Fertility, New york: Russell Sage Basis, 2001, pp. 317–343.
40. Kirby D, Emerging Solutions 2007: Lookup Findings into the Software to minimize Adolescent Maternity and you will Sexually Sent Sickness, Washington, DC: Federal Strategy to end Teen and you can Unexpected Pregnancy, 2007.
41. Kirby D, The fresh impact from software to improve birth control explore certainly one of adult women: a peek at experimental and you can quasi-fresh degree, Point of views into the Sexual and you can Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Affiliations
Jennifer Manlove is actually system urban area movie director and you may senior lookup researcher, Kate Welti is actually search scientist, E Wildsmith is actually elder research researcher and you will Megan Barry is actually look expert, all of the within Child Trends, Bethesda, MD.
Record
In the first investigation, that used an area-town attempt away from adolescents for the Kansas, Manning and you can acquaintances 9 classified relationships qualities for the you to definitely list of positive qualities (eg intimate mind-revelation, romantic like and you may dating salience) and something list out-of bad services (such as for example disagreement and you can nonexclusivity). They found that highest results into possibly list was in fact for the less condom surface. Detailed analyses and ideal you to definitely a mix of high positive and you will high bad results is on the quicker condom feel.
During the for each and every round, players was indeed requested “Once the date of last interview, are you presently within the an internet dating relationship in which you believe from oneself as part of several?” We experienced participants to settle a dating relationships if they answered sure and if the brand new spouse is actually a recently available dating lover, as opposed to a wife, cohabiting spouse otherwise former partner. Same-sex https://kissbridesdate.com/hot-belarus-women/ matchmaking matchmaking and the ones in which the respondent got prior to now cohabited for the mate was in fact excluded. Overall, cuatro,013 participants said a recent matchmaking matchmaking during the 2002–2005. Of one’s leftover participants, 553 were not from the test from inside the series of interest, step 1,876 were cohabiting or married, and you will 2,542 didn’t come with most recent relationships matchmaking. Participants within take to was basically aged 18–twenty six.
Matchmaking commitment was according to several strategies. The original is a great 0–ten level in which participants ranked the possibility which they and you can their lover was to one another in the six months. A get regarding zero conveyed no way; a good ten expressed 100% possibilities. I classified it possibilities once the lower (less than six), medium (6–9) or high (10). Towards the next measure of union, we provided a changeable to own whether or not the couples got talked about relationships otherwise cohabitation; answers have been categorized as the chatted about none, talked about cohabitation or chatted about marriage. (Respondents whom stated which have talked about each other cohabitation and you can wedding was integrated on the relationships class.)
Heterogeneous birth prevention outcomes within long term matchmaking may also be helpful identify straight down contraception feel into the stretched teenage relationship, despite deeper odds of ever before-the means to access contraceptives. 32, 33 Earlier research has translated it finding by positing one to lovers are prepared to sometimes forgo contraceptive include in more serious relationships; thirty two, 34 however, the show suggest that quicker contraception use are concentrated in long-emergency room label relationships described as high argument and lower connection.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and Pleck JH, Brand new character regarding younger men’s condom play with throughout the and you can round the dating, Relatives Think Views, 1994, 26(6):246–251.